Looking back at the long history of the Thoroughbred breed, a very curious pattern emerges. Many of the greatest racehorses who ever lived had little success at stud, while far more modest racehorses became very successful sires and broodmares. Even among those successful sires, only a fraction of them become sires-of-sires. Evidently there is some genetic magic at work here that creates such black-and-white success at stud, and racing ability is not the only important factor at work.

Taking this a step further, the most successful sires-of-sires (paternal grandsires) have rarely been the most successful broodmare sires (maternal grandsires), although both are, in the position of grandsires in the pedigree. Likewise, the most successful broodmare-sires have rarely been successful sires-of-sires. Traditional genetics would suggest that both these grandsires should transmit the same amount of genetic material to their descendants, but historical breeding records suggest some deeper forces at work.

In the early years of the 20th century, Phalaris rose from modest origins to become the major foundation sire of the century. Today more than 90% of the leading sires in North America trace to Phalaris in the male line, (topline of the pedigree), yet Phalaris never appeared as the broodmare-sire of a single important sire. Remarkably, the same can now be said for Northern Dancer, who has seen many of his sons and grandsons thrive at stud, yet he never appears as the broodmare-sire of a single major stallion. Going back to the dawn of the breed, the sons and grandsons of the great Eclipse likewise thrived at stud, while his daughters were very modest producers, and not one produced an important sire. Clearly something fundamental is going on here that requires understanding.

Advertisement