During the primeval years of Queen’s Plate history, many of the races in the “Gallop for the Guineas” were plagued by crises that produced events that were inexplicable and bizarre. The 12th running was little different than others. It manifested more unanswered questions for turf reporters, as well as later-day Plate historians. About the only fact of which they are unanimous was that the race occurred on May 24, 1871, the Queen’s birthday, at Kingston’s Cataraqui Course.

The identity of the winning jockey, the age and spelling of the horse’s name, and who owned the bay mare was contradicted by the Kingston Weekly Whig reporter and the correspondent for The Globe. Toronto’s Evening Telegram said Kingston won the race, confusing the site with the name of the winner. The Toronto Daily News had the owner and trainer also riding the winner. The Toronto World was uncertain of the race’s outcome, stating that one of Robert Davies’ horses won the Plate, but he was the rider and not the owner. All five newspapers differed slightly on events that occurred at Kingston.

In defense of the press coverage, it should be stressed that newspapermen assigned to racing in this era had to cope with unnumbered horses, jockeys wearing similar silks, and the skimpiest information from race officials. It is surprising that so much detail, coloured or erroneous, was recorded of early Plate races. Horses changed names frequently. For example, Spring was third in 1864 at Guelph, but the following year in London he was entered as Beacon (late Spring) and was disqualified.

Advertisement